| |
| | RFC 1573 (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-22) |
 | | Another possible but not recommended scheme would be to retain the concept of one conceptual row for all the sub-layers of an interface and have a new separate MIB table to identify the "superior" and "subordinate" sub-layers which contain OBJECT IDENTIFIER "pointers" to media-specific MIB module(s) for each sub-layer. |
 | | In other circumstances, an agent must not always return 0 for any counter just because its implementation is incapable of detecting occurrences of the particular event; instead, it must return a noSuchName/noSuchObject error/exception when queried for the counter, even if this prevents the implementation from complying with the relevant MODULE-COMPLIANCE macro. |
 | | RFC 1573 Interfaces Group Evolution January 1994 [3] Case, J., McCloghrie, K., Rose, M., and S. Waldbusser, "Protocol Operations for version 2 of the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMPv2)", RFC 1448, SNMP Research, Inc., Hughes LAN Systems, Dover Beach Consulting, Inc., Carnegie Mellon University, April 1993. |
| www.graphcomp.com /info/rfc/rfc1573.html (10539 words) |
|