| |
| | [No title] |
 | | So be it, but we should warn people of the limitation.) Bellovin [Page 2] RFC 1675 Security Concerns for IPng August 1994 Dual-stack approaches, such as in TUBA's transition plan [2], imply multiple addresses for each host. |
 | | By "non-intrusive", I mean that it should (a) present little or no load to intermediate hops that do not need to do authentication; (b) be deletable (if desired) by the border gateways, and (c) be ignorable by end-systems or billing systems to which it is not relevant. |
 | | Bellovin [Page 3] RFC 1675 Security Concerns for IPng August 1994 References [1] Gilligan, R., and E. Nordmark, "IPAE: The SIPP Interoperability and Transition Mechanism", Work in Progress, March 16, 1994. |
| www.ietf.org /rfc/rfc1675.txt (1139 words) |
|