| |
| | Clitoridectomy and Medical Ethics |
 | | In the third place, it is against all Medical science to remove such a part because "subject" (or subjected?—see note) " to unbearable irritation." Intense itching is a common malady, but this itching does not depend on local causes, and it may generally be relieved by proper measures. |
 | | Marshall Hall used to propose tracheotomy for epilepsy ; a living Surgeon once performed castration for the same malady ; each operation thoroughly unsuccessful, and not to be defended, save on the ground of the good faith of the proposers, and of an enthusiasm which had carried them beyond the bounds of sound discretion. |
 | | Thus, then, we have shown, as shortly as possible, the real position of clitoridectomy as an offence against science and morality, and the reasons why the Medical Profession, as an honourable, moral Profession, whose members have free and familial access to families, must repudiate and utterly reject it. |
| www.cirp.org /library/history/medicaltimes1867 (1743 words) |
|