| |
| | Kimball, Architecture in the History of the Colonies and of the Republic |
 | | Already it is becoming evident, however, that, down at least to 1830, the arts, especially architecture, occupied a place of much importance in American life, and that the relationship of American architecture to that of England and of Europe was by no means always backward and imitative. |
 | | Thus while minor craftsmen for a time continued traditions essentially colonial and English, the leaders sought to establish an architecture which should not be borrowed from contemporary European styles, but should be founded on the authority of the ancients, in whose republics the new states were felt to have their closest analogy. |
 | | Thus it is not the colonial style, but the classic architecture of the republic, in its two incarnations, old and new, which is a true contribution of America to universal development, a contribution well deserving to be recognized, even by the general historian. |
| www.dinsdoc.com /kimball-1.htm (4094 words) |
|