| | Science & Technology at Scientific American.com: The Economics of Science: Interview with Terence Kealey (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-09) |
 | | Its science was actually purer than that of the U.K. or the U.S. The countries with the next least investment were France and Germany, and were growing next fastest. |
 | | By "academic science" I mean pure or basic science as opposed to university science; the latter would dwindle, but the former would grow within industry. |
 | | Indeed, in my book I pointed out that quite a lot of the big foundations of science preceded 1940, and then after the huge influx of American government funding, people said, "Well, the government's doing that," and they started turning their attention to other things. |
| sciam.com /article.cfm?articleID=0005277B-64C2-1E5E-A98A809EC5880105 (666 words) |