| |
| |
Edwin Mulder Discussion |
 | | The 1RM value for the FW group was directly applicable for determining training intensity since load, or intensity and number of reps are inversely related (Beachle, 1994); the heavier the load, the fewer the number of repetitions that can be preformed. |
 | | The 1RM value for the FW group was directly applicable for determining training intensity since load, or intensity, and number of reps are inversely related (Beachle, 1994); for example, the heavier the load, the fewer the number of repetitions that can be preformed. |
 | | Apparent from the 1RM data is that the iRED6 subjects did not show any increases in 1RM strength for the squat exercise, however, increases (in percent) in heel raise and deadlift 1RM strength were almost identical to the FW group. |
| www.desc.med.vu.nl /Students/Mulder/Discussion.htm (9224 words) |
|