| |
| |
No. 29954-C |
 | | Complainant's claim that Respondent violated MERA when Supervisor Tom Berendes performed bargaining unit work on July 6, 1998 is based upon conduct that occurred more than one year prior to the date on which Complainant filed its initial complaint. |
| | While the continuing violation theory may be of relevance in determining the timeliness of a grievance claim, it is not applicable to a statute of limitations claim under Sec. |
| | The allegations that Respondent violated MERA when its supervisors performed bargaining unit work on December 30, 1998; February 19, 1999; October 18, 1999; January 20, 2000; March 22, 2000, and in July, 2000, are timely under Sec. |
| www.wisbar.org /res/wercd/2001/29954-c.htm (8612 words) |
|
