| |
| | International Code of Botanical Nomenclature (Tokyo Code) - Article 58 (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-07) |
 | | 51, 52, 53, 54, or 56, 57, 58 is replaced by the name that has priority (Art. |
 | | If none exists in any rank a new name must be chosen: (a) the taxon may be treated as new and another name published for it, or (b) if the illegitimate name is a later homonym, an avowed substitute (nomen novum) based on the same type as the rejected name may be published for it. |
 | | Authors should avoid adoption of the epithet of an illegitimate name previously published for the same taxon. |
| www.bgbm.fu-berlin.de /iapt/nomenclature/code/tokyo-e/Art_58.htm (325 words) |
|