| |
| | FRANCO MORETTI - GRAPHS, MAPS, TREES (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-17) |
 | | That figure 2 shows a first ‘rise’ (when the novel becomes a necessity of life), and then a second (the shift from the past to the present), and then a third (the multiplication of market niches), seems to me a good account of the data, but is certainly far from inevitable. |
 | | For most literary historians, I mean, there is a categorical difference between ‘the novel’; and the various ‘novelistic (sub)genres’: the novel is, so to speak, the substance of the form, and deserves a full general theory; subgenres are more like accidents, and their study, however interesting, remains local in character, without real theoretical consequences. |
 | | The forty-four genres of figure 9, however, suggest a different historical picture, where the novel does not develop as a single entity—where is ‘the’ novel, there?—but by periodically generating a whole set of genres, and then another, and another. |
| www.newleftreview.net /Issue24.asp?Article=05 (5361 words) |
|