| |
| | CJLF: Briefs: Price v. Vincent - Argument, Part II B - Conclusion (File 3 of 3) |
 | | It is difficult to argue with the logic that silence on the greater offense is an acquittal when the jury convicts on the lesser offense. |
 | | Scottexpounded on what constituted an acquittal, noting that acquittals could be based on the prosecution's failure to rebut affirmative defenses, or derived from " 'erroneous evidentiary rulings or erroneous interpretations of governing legal principles. . . .' " Id., at 98 (quoting id., at 106, Brennan, J., dissenting). |
 | | In Martin Linen, there was an acquittal in both form by the clear grant of a Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 29(c) motion to acquit and dismiss the jury, see 430 U. S., at 566, and in substance, by the District Court's reasons for granting the motion. |
| www.cjlf.org /briefs/Vincent2.htm (3459 words) |
|