| |
| | newton2.ww |
 | | Language, or at least the Adamic language, is not a product of use, a human social construct, in Paracelsus's view. |
 | | Returning for a moment to Ashworth, the parallelism and, indeed, the intimate relationship between language theory and natural history, together with their mutual legitimation through the work done in recasting cultural narratives, must not be forgotten in attempts to explain shifting models for the practice of natural history. |
 | | And yet, as was also the case in the study of language, this sheer diversity—the sheer weight of things and facts—was not of itself enough to transform the discourse of natural history. |
| www.stanford.edu /dept/HPS/WritingScience/etexts/Bono/Newton.html (11305 words) |
|