Where results make sense

About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   PR   |   Contact us

Topic: Adobe-RGB

    Note: these results are not from the primary (high quality) database.

Working Space Comparison: sRGB vs. Adobe RGB 1998 Adobe RGB is often depicted has having a superior gamut in greens, however this can be misleading and results mainly from the use of the CIE xyz reference space. Adobe RGB 1998 extends its advantage in the cyan-greens for the highlights, but now has advantages with intense magentas, oranges, and yellows-- colors which can add to the drama of a bright sunset. Adobe RGB 1998 does not extend as far beyond sRGB in the shadows, however it still shows advantages in the dark greens (often encountered with dark foliage). www.cambridgeincolour.com /tutorials/sRGB-AdobeRGB1998.htm   (1089 words)

EIZO /Advantages of the Adobe RGB Color Space Adobe RGB is a practical RGB color space that was introduced in 1998 by Adobe Systems Inc. As you can see from the color reproduction area comparison graph of Figure 1, compared with sRGB, Adobe RGB has a greater range in some parts of the color reproduction area, such as from blue to green. When Adobe RGB is used for the image data, the monitors used to display these images also need to support the wide color reproduction area of Adobe RGB. If the monitor is able to reproduce colors according to the Adobe RGB color space, it will be possible, for example, to display on the monitor the correct color reproduction area of the data of an image taken by a photographer using a digital camera in Adobe RGB mode. www.eizo.com /products/graphics/management/03.asp   (331 words)

Adobe RGB Color Space Encyclopedia Article, Definition, History, Biography The Adobe RGB color space encompasses roughly 50% of the visible colors specified by the Lab color space, improving upon the gamut of the sRGB color space primarily in cyan-greens. The Adobe RGB color space is an RGB color space developed by Adobe Systems in 1998. Adobe RGB Color Space Encyclopedia Article, Definition, History, Biography www.ourlocalcolor.com /encyclopedia/Adobe_RGB_color_space   (316 words)

Canon Digital Photography Forums - adobe rgb Adobe RGB provides a wider gamut, but is not taken into account with consumer print shops/kiosks as well as certain consumer level graphics software and may result in unmatched colors. Adobe RGB should be used in conjection with photo tools and print processes that recognize Adobe RGB, otherwise you may not be getting what you may expect. Using Adobe RGB does add a factor of complexity to your workflow. photography-on-the.net /forum/printthread.php?t=22309   (950 words)

Adobe RGB 1998 - HP 3500 CP Adobe RGB 1998- HP 3500 CP This animation shows how the Adobe RGB 1998 color space (depicted in white) compares with that of a CYMK HP3500 CP wide-format ink jet printer using glossy photo paper. super.nova.org /PhotoClass/Part7/ICC_3D/AdobeRBG_HP3500_Photo.html   (36 words)

RGB color space Adobe RGB is also being built into more medium-range digital cameras, and is favored by many professional graphic artists. Adobe has recently developed another color space called Adobe Wide Gamut RGB, which is even larger, in detriment of gamut density. RGB is a convenient color model for computer graphics because the human visual system works in a way that is similar - though not quite identical - to an RGB color space. www.worldhistory.com /wiki/R/RGB-color-space.htm   (307 words)

Adobe RGB color space -- Facts, Info, and Encyclopedia article The Adobe RGB color space is an (additional info and facts about RGB color space) RGB color space developed by (additional info and facts about Adobe Systems) Adobe Systems in 1998. Adobe RGB color space-- Facts, Info, and Encyclopedia article www.absoluteastronomy.com /encyclopedia/a/ad/adobe_rgb_color_space2.htm   (41 words)

Prints and Adobe RGB vs. sRGB The sRGB or Adobe RGB spaces are commonly used because their wide gamut means that they can hold images from many different sources and allow you to make quite large changes in an image whilst being confident that the colours held are a true representation. I always thought an RGB monitor had a larger colour space than either Adobe 1998 or sRGB and the reason for using a reduced colour space is based on the fact that a reflective medium like a print is not able to diplay the wide range of colurs that a monitor can. Adobe RGB (1998) also have (or will have) a defined reference medium (Adobe is working on this). www.photo.net /bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00BLur   (7397 words)

Color spaces and you If your camera offers it, Adobe RGB is an excellent color space choice if your pictures are destined for the printed page, or both the printed page and the Web. A gamma of 1.8—vs. 2.2 for sRGB and Adobe RGB - means that if you are looking at a photo that's too dark and murky in the midtones, switching to ColorMatch RGB can be a simple and effective way to brighten the photo. The solution that most photographers will have to accept is no solution—you'll simply have to live with the fact that Adobe RGB photos look flat and unsaturated in most browsers. www.microsoft.com /windowsxp/using/digitalphotography/thebigpicture/colorspaces.mspx   (1512 words)

Understanding ProPhoto RGB Simply, that if you are using the Adobe RGB colour space with a Canon 20D, for example, (and this applies to virtually every other DSLR on the market), you are not getting a lot of the deep saturated colours that the camera's sensor is capable of capturing. It's clear from this that the Adobe 98 space is quite a bit bigger, and that especially in the greens and reds / oranges, there is a lot of clipping if sRGB is used. Though I'm familiar with the book and many of Bruce's other writings, and I knew that ProPhoto RGB is a bigger space than Adobe RGB, somehow there wasn't a mental connect – until recently. www.luminous-landscape.com /tutorials/prophoto-rgb.shtml   (1705 words)

sRGB - Adobe RGB comparison Adobe RGB 1998 and the HP 3500 CP color spaces shows only minor clipping in dark magenta and blue colors. This animation shows how the Adobe RGB 1998 color space (depicted in white) used as the U.S. Prepress default in PhotoShop 6.0 maps to the smaller sRGB color space standard put forth by Microsoft and HP. CONCLUSION: Adobe RGB is a far better working space than sRBG if you plan to print the file. super.nova.org /PhotoClass/Part7/ICC_3D/sRGB_AdobeRGB1998.html   (167 words)

Adobe Photoshop Training with Dan Margulis Adobe RGB is a true 2.2 curve, while sRGB is about 2.3 or 2.4 with a linear segment at the bottom. Adobe RGB and sRGB have the same xy values for red, but Adobe has a higher Y value, which means you can represent brighter reds, not more saturated ones. Even some pro labs have been slow to grasp that RGB comes in different flavours and they need to convert from the clients colourspace to whatever their printer expects (or better still convert to the printer profile). www.ledet.com /margulis/ACT_postings/ProfilingandProofing/ACT-sRGBvAdobe_2004.htm   (8572 words)

sRGB and Adobe RGB The Adobe RGB might well be good for colours but is hell of a disapointment when printing with this profile. If the best results were to be obtained by use of Adobe RGB in all circumstances it would be the default and possibly the only available choice on a DSLR. SRGB I is supposed to be good for well balanced portraits, Adobe RGB is supposed to be good for manipulation, SRGB II is supposed to be good for landscapes. www.ephotozine.com /forum/viewanswers.cfm?qid=21262   (861 words)

Adobe ICC profiles for bundlers - ICC profiles for Macintosh - Downloads Adobe does not permit the use of the Adobe RGB trademark for software, hardware, or other related products from companies other than Adobe, unless the company has obtained a prior written license from Adobe to do so. Adobe shall not be liable for loss or damage arising out of this Agreement or from the distribution or use of the Software or any other materials. Adobe ICC profiles for bundlers - ICC profiles for Macintosh - Downloads www.adobe.com /support/downloads/detail.jsp?ftpID=3148   (2423 words)

SportsShooter.com - News: Pushing Pixels: Color Spaces or, 'What does Adobe RGB and sRGB mean anyway?' Adobe RGB is a larger color space than sRGB, but that doesn't make it intrinsically better. Canon had Matrix choices in their cameras, and Matrix 4 was Adobe RGB (Canon's more recent cameras make it easier by having a choice that just says "Adobe RGB"). Billy's partially right when he says that he knows that Adobe RGB is "better." Let's start by talking about what color spaces are and where sRGB and Adobe RGB came from. www.sportsshooter.com /news/1133   (1372 words)

färgrymder Fargene er "identiske" i verkligheten, og burde derfor være identiske i både sRGB og i Adobe RGB (1998). If you set your RGB workspace to ADOBE RGB, you will be least likely to be throwing out values that you will be able to see in today's digital output devices, and yet the gamut is not so large that you will be wasting a lot of your color space and thus having posterization problems. Svar: Som du ser i diagrammet ovanför är färgrymden sRGB avsevärt mindre i omfång än ADOBE RGB. www.ekdahl.org /kurs/gamut_explanation.htm   (541 words)

Colour Gamuts - RGB Spaces In the 2d illustration above the difference between it and Adobe RGB 1998 might not seem that bad. Today there are really only three main choices for Working Spaces: sRGB for Web based images, Colormatch RGB for images intended to go to press, and Adobe RGB 1998 for images intended for output on a wide variety of devices with larger color gamuts. Thankfully with the introduction of Photoshop 6, Adobe simplified the process by eliminating some of the non standard working spaces and streamlining dialogues from Photoshop’s Color Settings. members.shaw.ca /johnalli/pages/tipsgamut2.html   (307 words)

Some Adobe RGB questions. However, the main reason for using Adobe RGB is because you get less clipping when converting to CMYK as the colour space match is a better fit. Adobe RGB will is fine as a working space. Whilst Adobe RGB has a wider gamut than sRGB, IIRC some of the Adobe RGB colour space will be out of gamut on a Fuji Frontier. www.forum4designers.com /message895.html   (1594 words)

smugmug - help - srgb versus adobe rgb 1998 But Adobe 98 has the same number of crayons as sRGB, so by reaching out to more colors, you're sacrificing fine increments that are so important in shadow detail, for example. There are other color spaces, such as Adobe RGB (1998), but no Windows-based browser can display them correctly. She calls them Adobe 98 and you notice some spiffy colors that the poor guy next to you doesn't have. hawker.smugmug.com /help/srgb-versus-adobe-rgb-1998   (747 words)

Color Management for Photographers #006 @Digital Outback Photo You can experience that Adobe RGB is a limiting factor in saturated colors like yellows where Adobe RGB would just level all kind of different shades of saturated yellow to a few limited yellow colors. Once the file is converted to Adobe RGB these extra shades of color are gone. If you like the printed results from these pictures in Adobe RGB just leave them. www.outbackphoto.com /color_management/cm_06/essay.html   (1714 words)

Adobe RGB?? Adobe RGB is normally used for some professional purposes, e.g. If you are printing them yourself out of photoshop, I would personally shoot in Adobe RGB for it's slightly wider gamut in the greens (which I like). With cameras and Adobe Photoshop CS (PsCS) you can generate a correct profile for different shooting situations and cameras, and load that profile to use when shooting those situations with each camera. www.photo.net /bboard/q-and-a-fetch-msg?msg_id=00Aq6h   (623 words)

Topic awaiting preservation: Newbie help needed with RGB colour management — OZONE Asylum, home of the Mad Scientists Adobe RGB has a wider colour space than sRGB, quote Adobe: "The larger the RGB working space, the farther apart each color value would be from its nearest neighbor." which comes down to Adobe RGB has a broader range of colours. I've change the work space to Adobe RGB as recommended in the books I've been reading. HOWEVER, when you send the RGB file to the printer, at some point no matter what method is used to fix the pigments to the paper, you have switched the image from an additive color space to a subtractive color space. www.ozoneasylum.com /25124   (3861 words)

Outdoor Photographer Feature Article Digital Horizons: Color Space Wars That doesn’t mean that the Adobe RGB color space gave anything but the best in prints, too; it just affected the workflow. I even had some friendly arguments with folks in the industry who were convinced that Adobe RGB was the best way to go, period, no questions asked, war over and won. This is really what the sRGB and Adobe RGB choice is about: personal preferences. www.outdoorphotographer.com /content/2005/july/dh_color.html   (1285 words)

Digital Light & Color Message Boards: Adobe RGB vs Adove RGB (1998) Adobe RGB (1998&; is the newer one and widely used and the default working color space for the Adobe products. What is the difference between the two Adobe color spaces? In europe we offen use another color space: ECI RGB www.dl-c.com /cgi-bin/discus/show.cgi?tpc=2&post=9931   (121 words)

Director Online Article: Poaching Adobe's RGB Color Picker I also wrote handlers that bring the color chip into focus when it's clicked on (resetting all the sliders), limit text entry for the RGB values, and a slider behavior that is attached to both the slider and the tracks themselves. The three RGB color values are my slider values. These sliders range from 0 to 255 and describe the RGB values of the color. director-online.com /buildArticle.php?id=909   (1034 words)

sRGB vs. Adobe RGB Adobe RGB) and convert it using their Pictrography profile. As for RGB flavors, this would depend on your work flow and the final use intended for the images. RGB has more color info and we can always convert to CMYK for example by apply on demand, the proper profile like Euroscale, SWOP, etc. www.ledet.com /margulis/ACT_postings/ACT-sRGBvsAdobeRGB.html   (6470 words)

Adobe RGB before or after? - FM Forums Adobe RGB will give you a larger color gamut, which is important for colors such as red which will overexpose faster in sRGB. My initial thoughts are that yes it would make a difference; but, after learning that an image can't be labeled Adobe RGB (only sRGB or not sRGB) I am not so sure anymore. The reason I ask (instead of just shooting Adobe RGB) is because the sRGB files look so much better when I am posting low res unedited samples (i.e. www.fredmiranda.com /forum/viewtopic_archives.php?TopicID=59467&page=0   (553 words)

Digital Camera Resource Page - Forums - Adobe RGB much brighter I shoot in Adobe RGB and did not convert to sRGB, so when I posted some of my paintball pics on the web, the colors were lacking saturation, so I converted to the srgb colorspace and it was better. Well, there is one thing (at least) that I don't understand about Adobe RGB color space... I wonder the same about Adobe RGB, wich one to use for printing in a lab. www.dcresource.com /forums/printthread.php?t=6727   (435 words)

Zuga.net Forums - Wasted Money on Adobe CR Winner is NONE of them with NC 3.5 Adobe RGB as the closest. NC 3.5 sRGB, NC 3.5 Adobe RGB, CR sRGB, and CR Adobe RGB. Winner, CR Adobe RGB with NC 3.5 Adobe RGB a close second. www.zuga.net /forums/showthread.php?t=14402   (530 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)

About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   Press   |   Contact us   Copyright © 2005-2007 www.factbites.com Usage implies agreement with terms.