| |
| | FRANK LANDRY, ET AL., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. AIR LINE PILOTS ASSOCIATION INTERNATIONAL AFL-CIO, TACA AIRLINES, S.A. ... (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-23) |
 | | Huttinger was unqualified to represent ALPA in the negotiation of the "Pilots' Agreement." Huttinger had been placed on "sick" status by TACA, and according to the pilots, under the Constitution and By-Laws of ALPA, a pilot classified as "sick" was not permitted to hold an office within the union. |
 | | ALPA and TACA filed motions to dismiss or, alternatively, for summary judgment, contending that the DFR/breach of contract claim was barred by the applicable six-month statute of limitations and that the pilots had failed to state a claim for relief under ERISA. |
 | | Pilots have not alleged or provided any proof which would tend to show that defendants [**25] actively concealed their conduct or that the pilots exercised reasonable diligence, from that time until less than six months before they filed suit, in order to learn of their legal claims. |
| www.thelaborers.net /court_cases/landry_v_air-line_pilots.htm (14154 words) |
|