| |
| | Manas: History and Politics, British India, review of Suleri's Beyod Alterity |
 | | Suleri argues that the study of colonial discourse has been too bound to the idea of otherness, to the binarism of East and West, female and male, colonized and colonizer, to allow the decentring of master-narratives to which it aspires, and which has been so critical for the arguments now associated with postmodernism and postcoloniality. |
 | | It is, in the last analysis, to Suleri's critique of otherness, to the prevailing hegemony of the trope of alterity, to which we must return. |
 | | The question of temporality aside, the last chapter on Rushdie suggests that alterity is already a diminishing trope in what Suleri describes as "colonial cultural studies", for the location from which we speak, as postcolonial critics have been arguing, is critical to the determination of the politics of our utterances. |
| www.sscnet.ucla.edu /southasia/History/British/Suleri.html (1682 words) |
|