Factbites
 Where results make sense
About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   PR   |   Contact us  

Topic: Amici curiae


Related Topics

In the News (Fri 21 Nov 08)

  
  Motion For Leave To File A Brief For Amici Curiae And Brief For Amici Curiae - Center for Professional Responsibility
Amici believe that their national perspective and extensive practical experience, as reflected in the arguments below, will be of considerable assistance to the Court in its resolution of the important questions presented in the petition.
Accordingly, amici request that their motion for leave to file a brief in support of petitioners be granted.
The interest of the amici curiae is set forth in the accompanying motion for leave to file this brief.
www.abanet.org /cpr/mjp/mjp-birbrower.html   (5328 words)

  
  Amicus curiae - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Amicus curiae (plural amici curiae) is a legal Latin phrase, literally translated as "friend of the court," that refers to someone, not a party to a case, who volunteers to offer information on a point of law or some other aspect of the case to assist the court in deciding a matter before it.
In the United States, Federal courts often hear cases involving the constitutionality of state laws: other states may file briefs as amici curiae when their laws are likely to be affected.
Amici curiae that do not file briefs often present an academic perspective on the case.
en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Amicus_curiae   (538 words)

  
 Ashland brief
Amici believe that the principles that govern the attribution of causation in medical matters should be, can be, and to a considerable extent are, as scientific as any application of these same principles to "Newtonian science" (a term used in the Dennis opinion, Moore v.
Amici further believe that the decision of the District Judge Milloy to exclude testimony of Dr. Jenkins in the above case was well within the scope of the guidelines enunciated by the United States Supreme Court in Daubert and further endorsed and explained by the Supreme Court in General Electric Co. v.
Amici refrain from commenting in more detail on this reference, which seems to them taken out of its context by Judge Dennis, because they understand that Professor Feinstein is presenting his own views to the court in a separate amicus curiae brief.
www.atlanticlegal.org /ashland.html   (3562 words)

  
 Brief for Amici Curiae Law Professors In support of Respondent   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-15)
Amici are law professors with extensive experience in the study of constitutional law, the history of the Fourteenth Amendment and the jurisdiction of the federal courts.
Amici have no personal interest in the outcome of this litigation, but are deeply concerned with the development of jurisprudence regarding the respective roles played by the coordinate branches of federal government in protecting the civil rights of the people of the United States.
Amici are also concerned as scholars and citizens with the role of the federal government in the correction of State discrimination against certain classes of people, and the doctrinal resolution of tension between federal power and state sovereignty in this area.
www.dredf.org /law_profs.html   (6933 words)

  
 Dickerson v. United States of America
Amici are national and state professional associations representing the interests of law enforcement agencies at the state and local levels.
Amici submit that the adoption of state legislative provisions and state supreme court procedural rules similar to § 3501 will further the general movement of this Court and others for exclusionary rule reform in the area of not only fifth amendment and sixth amendment issues, but fourth amendment issues as well.
Amici urge this Court to uphold the constitutionality of 18 U.S.C. § 3501 on the basis of its post-Miranda precedents and sound judicial policy.
www.aele.org /99-5525.html   (2324 words)

  
 Project DIANA : Doe v. Karadzic : Brief Amici Curiae from Alliances..
Since this issue is amply briefed by the appellants and other amici, this brief is submitted to emphasize the significance of the district court's dismissal for the rights of the women plaintiffs and the women victims and survivors who are among the members of their class.
Accordingly, amici submit this brief to underscore the significance of this case for women and the necessity of reversing the district court in order to avert impunity and to provide the abused women, as well as other victims and survivors, with fullest possible vindication of their terrible suffering and losses.
Amici stress the importance of vindication and redress particularly for women given the historic failure to punish crimes against women and the profound importance of recognizing the egregiousness of these offenses to the long process of personal healing and reconstruction.
www.yale.edu /lawweb/avalon/diana/karadzic/5june.htm   (9802 words)

  
 Project DIANA : Motion for Leave to file Brief Amici Curiae
Third, the Amici are experienced in and have been committed to furthering their interests by filing amicus briefs in other cases that have dealt with issues similar to those raised in this litigation.
The Amici wish to highlight the significance of the Nuremberg prosecutions in the context of the "implied waiver" argument, and in so doing, to demonstrate that under these circumstances, the courts of this nation are not closed to an American citizen who has been lawlessly-victimized by a foreign state.
The Amici adopt the Statement in the Petition for Writ of Certiorari.
www.yale.edu /lawweb/avalon/diana/princz/909.htm   (4116 words)

  
 California Courts: Rules: Title One: Rule 13. Briefs by parties and amici curiae
It must be served on all parties and the amicus curiae.
Revised subdivision (c)(2) states the showing required of a prospective amicus curiae in terms somewhat different from those of former rule 14(c), but no substantive change is intended.
Revised subdivision (c)(3) conforms amicus curiae practice in the Court of Appeal with amicus curiae practice in the Supreme Court by requiring that the application for permission to file an amicus curiae brief be accompanied by the proposed brief.
www.courtinfo.ca.gov /rules/titleone/title1-1-31.htm   (851 words)

  
 amici curiae   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-15)
"Amici curiae" means "friend of the court." Rules of appellate procedure typically afford an opportunity, with the court's advance permission, for persons or entities other than the parties to the litigation having an interest in the outcome of the litigation to submit briefs advocating a position.
Any other amicus curiae may file a brief only by leave of court or if the brief states that all parties have consented to its filing.
Four amici curiae briefs were submitted on behalf of a number of parties: Information Industry Association, American Medical Association, Association of American Publishers, Business Software Alliance, Software Publishers Association, American Committee for Interoperable Systems.
www.scu.edu /law/FacWebPage/Neustadter/e-books/abridged/main/cases/ProCDAmiciCuriae.html   (214 words)

  
 SFGov: Office of the City Attorney: Brief of Amici Curiae in Support of City of Tacoma
Amici curiae are municipal and county governments, officials, and organizations throughout the United States.(fn.
In addition, amici believe that the sheer volume of legal errors in the Court of Appeals decision, combined with the powerful and widespread impact these errors are having on local communities, enhance the need for Supreme Court review.
Amici believe that requiring maps showing where facilities are located, and requiring assurances that the construction will be performed in a safe and reliable manner or requesting information about past construction problems are consistent with prudent right-of-way management.
www.ci.sf.ca.us /site/cityattorney_page.asp?id=1294   (4813 words)

  
 Decision on the Interlocutory Appeal by the Amici Curiae Against the Trial Chamber Order Concerning the Presentation ...
The Accused requested a continuance of over two years to prepare his defence, pointing to the fact that he is conducting his own defence, the complexity of the case, a large number of witnesses he anticipated to present, and the extensive material disclosed by the Prosecution which he must examine.
The amici also argue that the Trial Chamber erred in relying on the fact that the Accused is assisted by two legal assistants, because it did not consider any evidence as to the nature and extent of that support.
It is proposed to consider the question in relation to (a) the amici curiae, (b) the accused acting by himself, and (c) the accused acting through the amici curiae as counsel.
www.un.org /icty/milosevic/appeal/decision-e/040120.htm   (4920 words)

  
 Amici Curiae and Strategic Behavior in State Supreme Courts — www.greenwood.com
Comparato answers these questions by employing strategic theories of judicial and group behavior, with groups motivated by the attainment of policy and group maintenance, and state supreme court justices motivated by policy and the continued maintenance of their position on the court.
In order to answer these questions, Comparto analyzes litigant and amicus curiae briefs as well as judicial decisions from seven state supreme courts to evaluate the effects of state-level institutions on the types of information provided to state supreme court justices, and how those justices respond to that information.
There is also support for the expectation that the information provided by litigants and amici, as well as the retention method, have a direct impact on the decision-making of justices.
www.greenwood.com /catalog/C7827.aspx   (432 words)

  
 Brief of Amici Curiae   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-15)
This brief is filed on behalf of individuals granted amici curiae status by the Trial Court and allowed to participate in the proceedings in that court.
The record establishes that the Amici represent the vast majority of birth parents and that Plaintiffs’ desire to conceal their identities from their children is shared by, at most, a very small minority of birth parents.
Likewise, the 15 Amici who are adoptive parents support the right of their children to know the identities of their birth parents and to see the records of their adoptions.
www.americanadoptioncongress.org /briefofamici.htm   (14292 words)

  
 Friends of America's Past: The Kennewick Man Case: Amici Curiae
Amici briefs in support of science (pdf format)
Amici briefs in support of the government and joint tribal coalition (in pdf format)
Motion of the Society for American Archaeology for Leave to Appear as Amicus Curiae [posted 12/19/00]
www.friendsofpast.org /kennewick-man/court/amici/amici.html   (216 words)

  
 Amici Curiae Brief in the case of Eldred v. Ashcroft
STATEMENT OF INTEREST OF This brief amici curiae in support of Petitioners is submitted by the American Association of Law Libraries, the American Library Association, the Association of Research Libraries, the Digital Future Coalition, the Medical Library Association, and the Society of American Archivists ("Amici") pursuant to Rule 37 of the Rules of this Court.
Amici do not argue against licensing fees as an appropriate means of rewarding authors and creators, nor do we suggest that we are prevented from invoking the fair use doctrine in appropriate situations.
Amici urge this Court to recognize the breadth of the harms the public will suffer if the CTEA is not found unconstitutional and to reaffirm the Framer's intent for Congress to promote the public's interest through balanced copyright law.
www.arl.org /info/frn/copy/ashcroft.html   (6297 words)

  
 NAPW: Brief for amici curiae juvenile law center
The Law Project has represented amici curaie in a number of recent cases involving the improper application of state criminal child abuse and drug delivery statutes to pregnant women and new mothers who have given birth while suffering from an addiction to drugs.
Amici adopt the Statement of the Case set forth in the Brief for Appellant.
Amici submit this brief in support of Appellant, K.R., whose children were wrongfully adjudicated dependent and removed from her home by the lower court.
www.advocatesforpregnantwomen.org /issues/amicicur.htm   (6513 words)

  
 26 Arts, Broadcast, Library, Museum and Publishing Amici Curiae
The rights of amici and their members and supporters, be they author, poet, novelist, artist, museum curator, librarian, public broadcaster, or other professional, to present the public with a broad range of viewpoints serve as a cornerstone of our nation's most fundamental freedoms.
Amici are concerned that if government officials are permitted to grant or withhold government benefits on the basis of an applicant's viewpoint, the diversity of perspective and the "free play of the spirit" which all who deal with words or images "ought especially to cultivate and practice," will be stifled.
It is this process, which occurs through the arts as well as through economic and political discourse, that the government should support; the government should not attempt to support or enforce a particular outcome of free exchange of ideas that identify the hallmark of democracy.
www.csulb.edu /~jvancamp/doc20.html   (11765 words)

  
 INTERESTS OF THE AMICI CURIAE
The amici curiae are journalism membership and trade associations, online publications, and academic institutions which are concerned that the District Court’s opinion, should it be affirmed, will significantly chill freedom of the online press by stifling one of its important features, linking.
Amici curiae are keenly aware that this case presents the issue of linking liability for the first time and that this holding may be the model for how future courts consider freedom of the online press hereafter.
Amici curiae urge that this court honor the Supreme Court’s endorsement of the World Wide Web as a "dynamic, multifaceted, category of communication" and exercise extreme caution so that the still-evolving field of online journalism is not substantially hindered at this critical stage in its development.
www.2600.com /dvd/docs/2001/0126-journalists.html   (4327 words)

  
 BRIEF AMICI CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITION FOR CERTIORARI   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-15)
Amici are public interest organizations who have as their mission the protection of First Amendment rights in the educational and creative process.
Rather the case presents the issue of whether it is constitutionally permissible to make a teacher a scapegoat or fire her for using a particular teaching technique that she had used for years, without first putting her on notice that use of that method is no longer permitted.
Counsel for a party did not author this brief in whole or in part and no person or entity, other than the amici curiae, its members, or counsel, have made a monetary contribution to the preparation or submission of the brief.
home.earthlink.net /~cissylacks/NewAmiciBrief.html   (4794 words)

  
 Institute of International Economic Law (IIEL)
The note also identifies the mechanisms that may be used to establish criteria to ensure amicus briefs promote predictability and procedural fairness in WTO dispute settlement.
From a legal perspective this explanation is neither entirely satisfactory nor convincing, raising questions concerning the manner in which the Appellate Body exercises the authority vested in it by the Members.
However, the decision also raises questions concerning the scope of the Appellate Body's review powers, the manner in which GATT Article XX(g) and chapeau should be interpreted, the authority of the Appellate Body to consider non-member submissions, and possible inadequacies in the Dispute Settlement Understanding.
www.law.georgetown.edu /iiel/current/amicus/amicuscuriae2.html   (898 words)

  
 Definition: Amicus Curiae.
Amicus Curiae briefs are filed in many Supreme Court matters, both at the Petition for Writ of Certiorari stage, and when the Court is deciding a case on its merits.
"An amicus curiae brief that brings to the attention of the Court relevant matter not already brought to its attention by the parties may be of considerable help to the Court.
A motion for leave shall identify the interest of the applicant and shall state the reasons why a brief of an amicus curiae is desirable.
www.techlawjournal.com /glossary/legal/amicus.htm   (272 words)

  
 Law Professors' Amici Brief in NY MPAA DeCSS Case (Jan. 26, 2001)
Amici are law professors who teach and write about intellectual property law at law schools within the United States.
[Return to text] Amici do not represent or speak for their institutions in this matter, and institutional affiliations are listed for identification purposes only.
Amici wish to acknowledge the invaluable assistance of Georgetown law students Rebecca Bjork, Troy Klyber, and Glenn Levy in the preparation of this brief.
www.eff.org /IP/Video/MPAA_DVD_cases/20010126_ny_lawprofs_amicus.html   (6788 words)

  
 amici-brief
Amici curiae are nuclear utilities similarly situated to plaintiff-appellant, Northern States Power Company (NSP).
Amici curiae confront staggering damages, statutory constraints barring certain means to mitigate those damages, and inadequate relief.
To amici curiae, no nexus links the nuclear utilities' payments to the Fund - which the trial court expects DOE to adjust - and the substantial damages due to DOE's failure to begin accepting SNF.
docs.law.gwu.edu /facweb/sschooner/amici-brief.html   (6730 words)

  
 Amici Curiae Not Dead Yet Brief in Support of Schiavo
Yet they don the cloak of public sanction every time a court lowers the constitutional bar on substituted judgments and consequently broadens the category of people with disabilities whose lives may be terminated.
The Ethics and Advocacy Task Force, as amicus curiae, raises a very legitimate concern that the “right to die” could become a license to kill.
Due to the fundamental life interests at stake, it would undoubtedly be unconstitutional for any state to fail to guard against these potential abuses.
www.thearclink.org /egroup/Schiavo/SchiavoNotDeadYetAmiciCuriae.htm   (4705 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)

Factbites
  About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   Press   |   Contact us  
Copyright © 2005-2007 www.factbites.com Usage implies agreement with terms.