| |
| | 'Acceptable to inquisitive men': some Simonian contexts for Newton's Biblical Criticism, 1680-1692' (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-23) |
 | | The 'historical account', dealt as its title intimated, with 'two notable corruptions of scripture': Newton's letters were contrived and presented as studies in textual criticism not as theological polemic, 'tis no article of faith, no point of discipline, nothing but a criticism concerning a text of scripture wch I am going to write about'. |
 | | Although a reader might not be competant to assess Simon's account of this or that linguistic obscurity, or would almost certainly be unable to consult the old manuscripts he cited, it would be clear, simply from the bulk of his discussion, that the assumption that Scripture was singular, inerrant and universal was no longer tenable. |
 | | Indeed it is not an exaggeration to suggest that Simon was deliberately calculating advice to cultivate a practice of private reading and criticism: this is a model that Locke and Newton would have recognised and embraced as supporting and validating their own activity. |
| www.rhbnc.ac.uk /~uhra026/simon1.html (6683 words) |
|