| |
| | Ananias of Shirak, On Christmas, The Expositor, 5th series vol. 4 (1896) Preface. pp.321-323. |
 | | Thus it is conceivable that Ananias had access even to primitive sources now lost to us, and in forming an estimate of the genuineness of the long citation from Polycarp of Ephesus with which this homily concludes, this should be taken into account. |
 | | Professor Harnack, however, leans against the genuineness of the citation, because he cannot believe the account given by Ananias in his other tract on Easter of the calendarial activity of Aristides the Apologist, and of Leonidas, father of Origen. |
 | | Ananias may have been wrong about the latter, and yet have been right about Polycarp; especially if----as Harnack admits----the citation is on other grounds likely to be genuine. |
| www.tertullian.org /fathers/ananias_of_shirak_on_christmas_01_intro.htm (715 words) |
|