| |
| | Johannes Kottonau and Claudia Pahl-Wostl: Simulating political attitudes and voting behavior |
 | | According to the dominant effects of strong attitudes on behaviour (Bargh, Chaiken, Govender and Pratto 1992, Bassili 1995, Fazio and Zanna 1978, Fazio and Williams 1986, Jonas, Broemer and Diehl 2000, Krosnick 1988), the involvement, the ambivalence, and the extremity of a citizen's attitude are modeled as the determinants of participation in the election. |
 | | The continuous revision of the attitude in the light of new evidence is a core element of the on-line relationship between memory and judgement (Hastie and Park 1986). |
 | | The other individual citizen characteristics (the speed of memory decay, the probability of beginning an attitude exchange and the weight of interpersonal communication, the level of the confirmation bias, the accessibility threshold, and the sharpness of this threshold) are uniformly distributed within the ranges presented in the Appendix. |
| jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk /7/4/6.html (11639 words) |
|