| |
| | Croke v Smith, O'Connor, The Eastern Health Board, Ireland and the Attorney General (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-07) |
 | | Counsel for Ireland and the Attorney General relies on Cahill v Sutton [1980] IR 269, which, apart from exceptional cases, limited locus standi to persons who could point to a detriment, actual or apprehended, to themselves resulting from the operation of the Act under challenge. |
 | | The main argument, on behalf of the appellant, against the validity of the section was based upon the absence of any judicial intervention or determination between the arrest of the person alleged to be of unsound mind and his subsequent detention under a reception order. |
 | | Having regard to their vulnerability, as a result of their perceived disorder, and their entanglement in the world of psychiatry, it is instructive to bear in mind that the US Supreme Court approaches the matter from the perspective of having as its touchstone a written Constitution which protects the liberty of the individual. |
| www.ucc.ie /law/irlii/cases/367ss-95_d.htm (15248 words) |
|