| |
| | Classical Views | 1996 | No. 1 | Book Reviews/Comptes Rendus | DIANE FAVRO (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-18) |
 | | Of the "secular" buildings that were erected in Augustan Rome (the Saepta, Diribitorium, Macellum Liviae, Baths of Agrippa, honorific arches, etc.), none seems to have been formally endowed in itself with a specific "religious" quality. |
 | | Even if Favro rejects a suggestion that such an arch was not actually erected, it is surely inappropriate now to state as a matter of fact that the "Parthian" Arch was placed between the Temple of Divus Julius and the Temple of Castor and Pollux (159). |
 | | Chapter 6 ("Meaning: Reading the Augustan City") is divided into sections with interesting headings: "Physical Unity," "Programmatic Unity," "Experiential Legibility," "Unifying Involvement," and "Legacy." It and Chapter 7, however, are marred by linguistic novelty and almost incomprehensible statements, as well as by unreliable history, typographical errors, strange diagrams, and inconsistent interpretations. |
| www.mun.ca /classics/mouseion/1997/reviews/favro.html (4892 words) |
|