| |
| | Enterprise Software / BPEL4WS vs. WSCI - Tech Update - ZDNet (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-23) |
 | | Although it is completely proprietary and hasn't even been submitted to a standards-setting body, all three companies already have plans to support the specification in their solutions as though it were a standard. |
 | | Unlike BPEL4WS, WSCI has taken the first step towards standardization through a submission to the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) by BPMI.org (which also developed an alternative to BPEL4WS called BPML), Commerce One, Fujitsu Limited, Intalio, IONA, Oracle Corporation, SAP AG, SeeBeyond Technology Corporation, Sun Microsystems, and strange as it may seem, BPEL4WS co-author BEA. |
 | | Let's suppose that BPEL4WS becomes the de facto standard, by virtue of BEA's, Microsoft's, and IBM's support for BPEL4WS in their application servers (which happen to be the application server market's three leading products). |
| techupdate.zdnet.com /techupdate/stories/main/0,14179,2912083-2,00.html (992 words) |
|