| |
| | Islamic Voice |
 | | Brahmachari may here be forgiven for his poor lack of understanding of the whole Partition phenomenon, as the myth that the Muslims were alone, or even largely, responsible, for the division of India is one that has been passionately propagated by ‘secularist’ Indian historians and their Hindutva counterparts alike. |
 | | The whole thrust of the Hindu ‘nationalist’ (read Brahminical) movement, starting from Bankimchandra Chatterji and Balgangadhar Tilak, to Savarkar, Hegdewar and Golwalkar (interestingly, all Brahmins) was vehemently opposed to the united participation of Muslims and Hindus in the struggle against British imperialism. |
 | | Indeed, the demand that the Muslims of north-west India (the present-day Pakistan) should be separated from the rest of India was first made, in the first decade of the present century, much before the Muslim League’s Lahore resolution of 1940, by none other than Bhai Parmamand, the Brahmin head of the arch-reactionary Hindu Mahasabha. |
| www.islamicvoice.com /april.99/features.htm (6689 words) |
|