| |
| | Douglas Low's "The Relevancy of Merleau-Ponty’s Political Theory" |
 | | And finally, the minimalist position is supported because the whole point of a minimalist framework such as “do what you want as long as no harm is brought to another” is to establish a principle of social constraint that grants as much freedom as possible to the individuals that must submit to the constraint. |
 | | This implies an equality of constraint, that is, each person’s freedom is constrained by that of all the others, Or stated positively, as has been done above: you can do whatever you want as long as you do not harm another, another’s property, or another’s freedom of choice and action. |
 | | The inequality of wealth and power (the lack of mutual constraint, particularly in the economic and political process) also puts the wealthy in the position b.) to harm the property values of others, for, generally speaking, their disproportionate control of economic policy favors their own property values often at the expense of others. |
| www.uwf.edu /dlow/mp-pol.htm (5518 words) |
|