| |
| | The Eternal Return: Imperialism and ‘Globalization’ Revisited - Empire? - Global Policy Forum (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-15) |
 | | While agreeing with Hobson that the colonial trade was not necessary as a means of securing markets for surplus goods and capital, world systems and dependency theorists argue that colonialism was, nonetheless, necessary to the industrialization of Europe as a means both of acquiring raw materials and of accumulating capital (see, e.g. |
 | | Colonies also provided labor that was even cheaper than that which was available at home and, in any case, was an alternative to mobilizing labor at home. |
 | | These ‘made the rules of the colonial game,’ and ‘diplomats, soldiers, businessmen, and settlers played accordingly.’ Other sub-national actors were involved, as well: ‘church societies, militarist lobbies, and bankers’ and, in some countries, these ’exercised substantial influence over the formulation of colonial policy’ (1983: 67). |
| www.globalpolicy.org /empire/history/2004/12eternal.htm (10911 words) |
|