| |
| | 51 Wn.2d 554, GUNDER BIRKELAND et al., Respondents and Cross-appellants, v. BILL CORBETT et al., Defendants, OLIVER D. ... |
 | | March 16, 1954, this action was commenced by Birkeland against Corbett and Houchen, predicated on the forfeiture, and seeking to have his title quieted against any claims by them, and to secure possession of the premises. |
 | | In their answer and cross-complaint, Gooden and Bergsma alleged that, with the knowledge and consent of Birkeland, they had acquired the interest of defendants Houchen and Corbett and had paid to Birkeland all amounts under the motel contract, and that he was obligated to dismiss the quiet title action, i.e., the present action. |
 | | Further, the court concluded that defendants Corbett and Houchen should take nothing by their cross-complaints, but that Houchen should receive $722.96, the value on September 2, 1954, "of the short-rate unexpired insurance policies," which he had taken out on the motel. |
| www.mrsc.org /mc/courts/supreme/051wn2d/051wn2d0554.htm (3719 words) |
|