| |
| | mac6-reviews |
 | | Stone's "conspiracy" and "Beast" theses about American politics had come under attack during JFK, and these attacks would be repeated in the reception of Nixon. |
 | | What is most interesting about Stone's reviews is that they can be easily designated as negative or laudatory, rarely "mixed," since his reviewers seem to be airing their feelings about Oliver Stone as much as they air their feelings about his films. |
 | | Rogers, in discussing Stone's scholarly critics, asks the important question, "Whose history is it anyway?" Rogers defends both JFK and Nixon on the grounds that the former had a real impact when evidence was found that Clay Shaw, a character in the film, might have been involved in the planning of JFK's assasination. |
| www.lehigh.edu /~ineng/mac6/mac6-reviews.html (1596 words) |
|