| |
| | 1030039.txt |
 | | Board of Zoning Appeals, 233 Va. 37, 44, 353 S.E.2d 727, 733 (1987) ("consistent administrative construction of an ordinance by the officials charged with its enforcement is entitled to great weight"); Rountree Corp. v. |
 | | Disagreeing with the Board, the court stated that it was not bound to accept the testimony of Ehrlich and Owolabi because, according to the court, their testimony had been challenged on cross- examination. |
 | | The court then held that Robertson had met his "twin burden of proving his proffered use of the property was reasonable and the Board's rejection of his application was unreasonable." Next, the court considered whether the defendants had produced evidence to establish that the Board's rejection of Robertson's application was fairly debatable. |
| www.courts.state.va.us /opinions/opnscvtx/1030039.txt |
|