| |
| | Copenhagen Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics |
 | | Bohr therefore believed that what gives us the possibility of talking about an object and an objectively existing reality is the application of those necessary concepts, and that the physical equivalents of “space,” “time,” “causation,” and “continuity” were the concepts “position,” “time,” “momentum,” and “energy,” which he referred to as the classical concepts. |
 | | In general, Bohr considered the demands of complementarity in quantum mechanics to be logically on a par with the requirements of relativity in the theory of relativity. |
 | | Bohr believed that atoms are real, but it remains a much debated point in the recent literature what sort of reality he believed them to have, whether or not they are something beyond and different from what they are observed to be (Folse 1985 and 1994; and Faye 1991). |
| plato.stanford.edu /entries/qm-copenhagen (4423 words) |
|