| | GAO-04-125T, Indian Issues: Spokane Tribe's Additional Compensation Claim for the Grand Coulee Dam |
 | | Bonneville Would Have to Recover Settlement Costs from Ratepayers, but Magnitude of Rate Increase Would Be Small: A settlement requiring Bonneville to pay the Spokane tribe would add to its costs of operation, and it therefore would probably pass these costs to Bonneville's customers in the form of higher rates for power. |
 | | Bonneville is primarily paying the recurring annual payments, and the U.S. Treasury's Judgment Fund provided the one-time lump sum payment in settlement of the past annual payments--$53 million.[Footnote 11] The Spokane tribe, however, had already settled its claim years earlier and therefore could not file an amended claim with the commission. |
 | | Nevertheless, since Bonneville collects the annual revenues for the electricity generated by the dam, it could be argued that Bonneville should make annual payments to the Spokane tribe out of those revenues, as it does for the Colville tribes; the U.S. Treasury would then pay a lump sum to settle any claims for past years. |
| www.gao.gov /htext/d04125t.html (3554 words) |