
	Where results make sense

Topic: Podolsky, Boris

Related Topics

EPR paradox

Bohr model

Niels Bohr

Albert Einstein

Timeline of quantum mechanics, molecular physics, atomic physics, nuclear physics, and particle physics

Robert Millikan

Max Planck

Democritus

Institute for Advanced Study

Marie Curie

Antoine Becquerel

James Chadwick

1963

1913

Joseph Thomson

In the News (Wed 30 Dec 09)

Northern Trust

Marvin Harrison

Peter Chernin

Gary Locke

Match Play

Penelope Cruz

Mickey Rourke

AR Rahman

Danny Boyle

Hugh Jackman

	Boris Podolsky Information
		Boris Podolsky (Борис Подольский) born 1896, Taganrog, Russia - died 1966, U.S.A), was a Russian physicist.
		Working with Albert Einstein and Nathan Rosen, he conceived the EPR Paradox, which stimulated debate as to the interpretation of quantum mechanics.
		In 1933, Podolsky and Lev Landau conceived the idea to write a textbook of electromagnetism beginning with special relativity and emphasizing theoretical postulates rather than experimental laws.
	www.bookrags.com /wiki/Boris_Podolsky (125 words)

	Boris Podolsky - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
		Boris Podolsky (Борис Подольский) born 1896, Taganrog, Russia - died 1966, U.S.A), was a Russian physicist.
		In 1933, Podolsky and Lev Landau conceived the idea to write a textbook of electromagnetism beginning with special relativity and emphasizing theoretical postulates rather than experimental laws.
		In the hands of Podolsky and K. Kunz, the outline became "Fundamentals of Electrodynamics" (1969).
	en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Boris_Podolsky (156 words)

	Encyclopedia :: encyclopedia : Boris Trajkovski (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-14)
		Boris (Kiril) Trajkovski (June 25, 1956 - February 26, 2004) (Борис Трајковски in Cyrillic) was a president of the Republic of Macedonia (1999 - 2004).
		Born in the village of Murtino, near the Macedonian town of Strumica, from a Methodist family, Trajkovski graduated in 1980 with a degree in law from the St. Cyril and Methodius University in Skopje.
		Boris Trajkovski is survived by his wife Vilma and their two children, daughter Sara and son Stefan.
	www.hallencyclopedia.com /Boris_Trajkovski (682 words)

	Published
		Podolsky must renovate the existing 18th- and 19thcentury palace and adjacent historical buildings, and design a new Congress Hall, yacht club, diplomatic village, and two luxury hotels.
		Podolsky points out that while in Soviet times the licensing and standards enforced by state regulatory boards were rigid, the system was at least uniform throughout the country.
		A decade ago, Podolsky and Lemekhov's clients were the new class of robber barons - former Communist officials and mafia bosses - who were looting the ruins of the Soviet Union and building country mansions.
	www.jacobward.com /pubarch0402rus.html (1840 words)

	Podolsky - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
		Lukas Podolski, a Polish-born German football (soccer) player.
		Boris Podolsky (Boris Podolski), physicist, known for the EPR paradox.
		This is a disambiguation page: a list of articles associated with the same title.
	en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Podolsky (87 words)

	The Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Argument in Quantum Theory (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
		Whatever their precursors, the ideas that found their way into EPR were worked out in a series of meetings with Einstein and his two assistants, Podolsky and Rosen.
		The actual text, however, was written by Podolsky and, apparently, Einstein did not see the final draft (certainly he did not inspect it) before Podolsky submitted the paper to Physical Review in March of 1935, where it was accepted for publication without changes.
		Unfortunately, perhaps due in part to the difficulties presented by Podolsky's text, this is the argument most commonly cited in the physics literature and attributed to EPR themselves.
	plato.stanford.edu /entries/qt-epr (7636 words)

	The Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox
		Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen consider the situation where one could eventually measure the position of one of the quantum entities, let us say entity 2, that flies to the right (while entity 1 flies to the left).
		Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen conclude in their paper that this contradiction proves that quantum mechanics is an incomplete theory, in the sense that it cannot represent all elements of reality of a physical entity.
		This is a point that has been overlooked by the scientist studying the EPR paper, and also Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen were probably not aware of the 'ex absurdum' status of their proof of incompleteness of quantum mechanics.
	www.vub.ac.be /CLEA/aerts/publications/EPR_paradox.html (4322 words)

	Home EPR effect
		In-separability, still called the EPR effect (standing for Einstein Podolski Rosen), is a quantum phenomena.
		This means that physical reality either is not subject to the principle of local causation or does not objectively exist independent of the observers who participate in its creation.
		Recent theoretical developments in quantum theory known as the EPR effect (named Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen's 1935 paper on the quantum connection between spatially separated systems), now formulated in a theorem by John S. Bell (called Bell's Theorem), allow for the an instantaneous effect between any two places in the physical universe.
	www.epreffect.com (757 words)

	EPR - Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen
		Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen opened what is now a 60 year old discussion of correlated multi-particle quantum systems.
		The line of argument initiated by EPR was formally updated in 1964 when John Bell showed that the assumption of locality made by Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen was itself actually in contradiction with facts predicted by quantum mechanics.
		The paradox of Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen was advanced as an argument that quantum mechanics could not be a complete theory but should be supplemented by additional variables.
	www.nonlocal.com /hbar/epr.html (425 words)

	Citations: Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete - Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen ... (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-14)
		Einstein later referred to this as spukhafte Fernwirkungen (spooky actions at a distance) see [12, 25, 30] for more historical background) In 1964, Bell [3] formalized the notion of two particle nonlocality in terms of correlations among probabilities in a scenario where one of a number of a....
		Einstein later referred to this as spukhafte Fernwirkungen [spooky actions at a distance] see [2, 9] for more historical background) In 1964, Bell [1] formalized the notion of two particle nonlocality in terms of correlations among probabilities in a scenario where one of a number of a....
		This conflict is suppose to be a logical incompatibility between some elementary predictions of quantum theory and the idea that causal influences can propagate only into the forward....
	sherry.ifi.unizh.ch /context/40008/0 (4669 words)

	Michael Jackson's Area: Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm paradox (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-14)
		In quantum mechanics, the EPR paradox (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen) is a thouցht experiment which challenցed lonց-held ideas about the relation between, on the one hand the observed values of physical quantities and on the other, the values that can be accounted for by a physical theory.
		"EPR" stands for Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen, who introduced the thouցht experiment in a 1935 paper to arցue that quantum mechanics is not a complete physical theory.
		However, the principle of locality appeals powerfully to physical intuition, and Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen were unwillinց to abandon it.
	de_monoklin.de.out-make.info (3109 words)

	The secret of the EPR experiment - Physics - Helium (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-14)
		The EPR experiment was proposed in 1935 by Einstein and two of his...
		EPR Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen) stands for Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen, who introduced the thought experiment in a 1935 paper to argue that quantum mechanics is not a complete physical theory.
		It's a thought experiment which demonstrates that the result of a measurement performed on one part of a quantum system can have an instantaneous effect on the result of a measurement performed on another part, regardless of the distance separating the two parts.
	www.helium.com /tm/42644/einstein-podolsky-rosen-stands (161 words)

	Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen-Bohm paradox More Articles (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-14)
		In quantum mechanics, the EPR paradox (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen) is a thought experiment which challenged long-held ideas about the relation between, on the one hand the observed values of physical quantities and on the other, the values that can be accounted for by a physical theory.
		Actual experimental realizations of the EPR scenario often use the polarization of photon s, because it is easy to prepare and to measure.
		We will now introduce two concepts used by Einstein, Podolsky, and Rosen, which are crucial to their attack on quantum mechanics: (i) the elements of physical reality and (ii) the completeness of a physical theory.
	es_lao.tzu.es.new-news.info (3109 words)

	J.S. Bell: First edition, first printing of Bell's refutation of the EPR Paradox
		However, it was John Bell who investigated quantum theory in the greatest depth and established what the theory can tell us about the fundamental nature of the physical world.” –Andrew Whitaker, “John Bell and the most profound discovery of science”, Physics World, Dec. 1998.
		In 1935, Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen published a study concluding that because, in quantum mechanics, every element of physical reality did not have a counterpart in the physical theory, it could not be complete theory or description of nature.
		Specifically, the EPR Paradox (as their study became known) argued for the presence of some "hidden variables" in nature that were not recognized by the quantum mechanics.
	www.manhattanrarebooks-science.com /jsbell.htm (545 words)

	TIME.com: Past As Uncertain As Future -- Mar. 30, 1931 -- Page 1
		Richard Chace Tolman and Boris Podolsky of the institute—wrote a letter to The Physical Review.
		Their difficulty lies in the fact that the instant they recognize an electron, the electron disappears or changes its condition by reaction with the measuring device.
		Now Savants Einstein, Tolman & Podolsky prove that it is impossible to say exactly where that electron was before it struck the measuring device.
	www.time.com /time/archive/preview/0,10987,741320,00.html (633 words)

	Boris Podolsky - Scientology Service Completions
		The older a list, the more likely that a person listed on it is no longer involved in Scientology.
		Boris Podolsky in Scientology's Published Service Completion Lists
		Note: The dates listed above are the approximate publication dates of the magazines, which may be weeks or months later than the actual date the service was completed.
	www.truthaboutscientology.com /stats/by-name/b/boris-podolsky.html (272 words)

	EPR
		EINSTEIN, A., Podolsky, B. and Rosen, N. "Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?" in Physical Review,pp.777-780 Vol.
		In 1935, Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen published a study concluding that because, in quantum mechanics, every element of physical reality did not have a counterpart in the physical theory, it could not be a complete theory or description of nature.
		Specifically, the EPR Paradox (as their study became known) argued for the presence of some "hidden variables" in nature that were not recognized by the quantum mechanics.
	www.theworldsgreatbooks.com /epr.htm (220 words)

	American Scientist Online - Grappling with Quantum Weirdness (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-14)
		Einstein believed that quantum mechanics was an incomplete theory, because in many cases it was only capable of giving statistical predictions.
		His arguments were most sharply made in his work with Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen on the so-called EPR (Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen) paradox.
		Ghirardi carefully explains the EPR paradox, which is a real challenge to encapsulate in a way that makes sense.
	www.americanscientist.org /template/AssetDetail/assetid/45927 (807 words)

	Timeline: From the March 28, 1931 issue, Science News Online, March 31, 2001
		This amazing extension of the principles of the new physics is contained in a letter to the editor of the Physical Review, journal of the American Physical Society.
		Richard C. Tolman and Dr. Boris Podolsky of the California Institute of Technology, wrote this communication just before he left Pasadena to return to Germany.
		Einstein conclude that there is an uncertainty in the description of what has happened in the submicroscopic world with which the most recent theories of physics usually deal.
	www.sciencenews.org /articles/20010331/timeline.asp (399 words)

	The Quantised World
		He continued to be dissatisfied with the formulation of quantum mechanics and tried to find ways to challenge the theories.
		Seemingly unable to use the uncertainty principle for this purpose, he developed the EPR paradox with two younger colleagues at Princeton, Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen.
		Their argument centered around a quantum system consisting of a pair of particles (A and B) which are created with opposite spin, i.e.: the overall system has no net spin.
	nobelprize.org /educational_games/physics/quantised_world/interpretation-3.html (313 words)

	The EPR Paradox and Bell's Inequality Principle
		The subject is not yet closed, and may yet provide more interesting insights into the subtleties of quantum mechanics.
		A. Einstein, B. Podolsky, N. Rosen: "Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?" Physical Review 41, 777 (15 May 1935).
		J. Bell: "On the Einstein Podolsky Rosen paradox" Physics 1 #3, 195 (1964).
	math.ucr.edu /home/baez/physics/Quantum/bells_inequality.html (2076 words)

	Herman Branson - Physicist of the African Diaspora
		In 1939 he received his Ph.D. in Physics from the University of Cincinnati under the famous Boris Padowski.
		Branson, Herman The flow of a viscous fluid in an elastic tube: a model of the femoral artery.
		Podolsky, Boris; Branson, Herman On the quantization of mass.
	www.math.buffalo.edu /mad/physics/branson_herman.html (326 words)

	Alternate View Column AV-37
		This column is about nonlocality, and how, through Bell's theorem, the nonlocality implicit in nature has been demonstrated in the laboratory.
		In 1935 Einstein, with his collaborators Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen, published his list of objections to quantum mechanics in what has come to be known as "the EPR paper".
		The EPR paper lodged three main complaints against quantum mechanics, one of which was nonlocality.
	mist.npl.washington.edu /AV/altvw37.html (1982 words)

	THE QUANTUM BRAIN
		In 1935, three physicists, Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen criticized quantum mechanics claiming that if it were a complete model of reality, then nonlocal interactions between objects had to exist.
		Further details are laid out in the twentieth anniversary (autumn, 1993) issue of
		Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N., (1935) "Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Reality be Considered Complete?" Physical Review, vol.
	www.fiu.edu /~mizrachs/quantum-brain.html (2267 words)

	TITANIA
		To see that this is so, it helps to understand the cause of the Problem.
		This website is the intellectual property of Robert E. Podolsky, Creative Consulting Services, Inc., and Titania, Hlmt.
		Reproduction in whole or in part without written permission is forbidden by law.
	www.titanians.org (251 words)

	P221TOPICS: QUANTUM TELEPORTATION (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-14)
		Teleportation is deconstructing an object or person in one place and generating a perfect replica somewhere else.
		The idea of teleportation was originally thought of in the 1930's when Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen wrote a famous paper concerning the scanning process that would be involved during teleportation, this was later known as the EPR effect.
		Answer: The first is the EPR effect developed by Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen.
	www.upei.ca /~physics/p221/topics/telep.htm (243 words)

	[No title]
		Evidence for Quantum Brain Fluctuations Sent from: sarfatti@netcom.com (Jack Sarfatti) Subj: EPR Correlations #1 Date: 94-06-11 04:46:53 EDT From: DougieG Here's an interesting bit of scientific research: Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen Correlations in the Brain-Mind: the Transferred Potential {Taken from "Science Within Consciousness: Developing a Science Based on the Primacy of Consciousness," by Amit Goswami, PhD.
		Posted with permission, see published report for full bibliographic references and [4] for EEG recordings of evoked and transferred potentials} In 1935, three physicists, Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen criticized quantum mechanics claiming that if it were a complete model of reality, then nonlocal interactions between objects had to exist.
		Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., Rosen, N., (1935) "Can Quantum Mechanical Description of Reality be Considered Complete?" Physical Review, vol.
	www.eff.org /Net_culture/Consciousness/the_quantum_brain.article (2430 words)

	Quantum Teleporting, Part 2: Our Holographic Universe - Chuck Missler - Koinonia House
		One physicist who was deeply troubled by Bohr's assertions was Albert Einstein. Despite the role Einstein had played in the founding of quantum theory, he was not pleased with the course the fledgling science had taken.
		In 1935 Einstein and his colleagues Boris Podolsky and Nathan Rosen published their now-famous paper, "Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?"
		One factor that contributed to Bohr's following was that quantum physics had proved so spectacularly successful in predicting phenomena, few physicists were willing to even consider the possibility that it might be faulty in some way. The entire industries of lasers, microelectronics, and computers have emerged on the reliability of the predictions of quantum physics.
	www.khouse.org /articles/2002/398 (896 words)

	The Scientific Attitude
		The willingness to give up an old established theory as soon as it is proved to be definitely inconsistent with a single scientific fact is the attitude of Science; no branch of knowledge without this attitude can be called a science." Boris Podolsky, "What is science?,"
		Nothing can be called scientific that is not based on such an attitude." Boris Podolsky, "What is science?,"
		It is the method by which Science grows and develops; it is part of a complex process of social life itself, and no short description can give an adequate picture of it." - Boris Podolsky (collaborator of Einstein),
	www.batesville.k12.in.us /physics/PhyNet/AboutScience/scientific_attitude.htm (413 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)