| |
| | In re Marriage of Brooks, 51 Wash. App. 882, 756 P.2d 161 (Wa.App. 06/28/1988) (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-20) |
 | | Brooks, as separate property, his interest in the tangible assets of the law firm, but characterized his goodwill in the firm as community property valued at $93,115; it was awarded to Mr. |
 | | Brooks contends that in a professional corporation the shareholder spouse contributes labor, primarily; thus, any goodwill is a return for community labor and therefore should be characterized as community property. |
 | | Brooks' law practice, not just the goodwill, as community property, since he was in law practice only about 4 years before marriage and 13 years after marriage. |
| home.att.net /~jmtyndall/allpapers/756p2d161.htm (2908 words) |
|