| |
| | 59 Wn.2d 757, HATTEN MACHINERY COMPANY, Appellant, v. JOHN N. BRUCH et al, Respondents |
 | | Respondent Bruch counter-claimed, alleging that the equipment was not as warranted and, therefore, caused Bruch to suffer damages measured by advance rental paid, transportation expense, extra labor expense and repairs. |
 | | Bruch, while engaging in activities pursuant to a contract to construct a road for a logging company, contacted the appellant corporation by telephone and talked to Jack T. Hatten. |
 | | The exact conversation is in dispute, but the trial court found, and Bruch's testimony is to the effect, that Bruch informed Hatten of a need for two ten-yard, rubbertired earth removers, or scrapers, for the purpose of loading and transporting gravel over a hard road from its source to the contemplated logging road. |
| www.mrsc.org /mc/courts/supreme/059wn2d/059wn2d0757.htm (1520 words) |
|