| |
| | RE: Bruhathkayosaurus (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-05) |
 | | -----Original Message----- From: owner-dinosaur@usc.edu [mailto:owner-dinosaur@usc.edu]On Behalf Of Ken Kinman Sent: Monday, June 18, 2001 8:42 PM To: dinosaur@usc.edu Subject: Bruhathkayosaurus Dear All, The name Bruhathkayosaurus didn't ring a bell, so had to look it up. |
 | | If it was a dinosaur, it was apparently a sauropod, not a huge theropod as originally thought. |
 | | He said that it IS a dinosaur, a titanosaur. |
| dml.cmnh.org /2001Jun/msg00626.html (166 words) |
|