| |
| | Cognitive semantics and diachronic semantics: the values and evolution of classes |
 | | Without trying to play with words, one can wonder if the value (relevant linguistic difference) is not ultimately founded upon the values, in the social sense of the term, including the ethic and aesthetic judgements [26]. |
 | | Thus, as Vaugelas pointed out: “Pour les personnes, on dit encore regarder en face, reprocher en face, soustenir en face, résister en face mais toujours sans l’article la” (1647 : 60 [for people, we still say regarder en face, reprocher en face, soustenir en face, résister en facebut always without the definite article la ]). |
 | | Vaugelas may find that "usage put it out of use" (1647: Préface, IX) for ridiculous, extravagant and very insulting reasons. |
| www.revue-texto.net /Inedits/Rastier/Rastier_Cog-sem.html (8925 words) |
|