| |
| | CLARK v. CANADIAN NATIONAL RAILWAY CO., [1988] 2 S.C.R. 680 (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-08) |
 | | Canadian National Railway Co. (1976), 75 D.L.R. (3d) 87, held that it should be construed so as not to apply to the procedural law governing actions by infants, and that it did not displace the special limitation period for infants found in s. |
 | | Canadian Pacific Railway Co. (1915), 51 S.C.R. 338, the question was whether burning worn-out ties to keep the railway right-of-way free from combustible material came within the definition of "operation of the railway". |
 | | Canadian Pacific Railway Co., supra, and Pszenicnzy, supra, were cases in which the limitation period in the Act was applied to common law actions for damages or injuries sustained by reason of negligence in the operation of a railway. |
| www.lexum.umontreal.ca /csc-scc/en/pub/1988/vol2/html/1988scr2_0680.html (8832 words) |
|