Factbites
 Where results make sense
About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   PR   |   Contact us  

Topic: Cancellation property


Related Topics

In the News (Fri 17 Feb 12)

  
  Cancellation property - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
In mathematics, an element a in a magma (M,*) has the left cancellation property (or is left-cancellative) if for all b and c in M, a * b = a * c always implies b = c.
An element a in a magma (M,*) has the right cancellation property (or is right-cancellative) if for all b and c in M, b * a = c * a always implies b = c.
A magma (M,*) has the left cancellation property (or is left-cancellative) if all a in the magma are left cancellative, and similar definitions apply for the right cancellative or two-sided cancellative properties.
en.wikipedia.org /wiki/Cancellation_property   (279 words)

  
 Natural number - Open Encyclopedia   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-21)
Properties of the natural numbers related to divisibility, such as the distribution of prime numbers, are studied in number theory.
An important property of the natural numbers is that they are well-ordered: every non-empty set of natural numbers has a least element.
Two generalizations of natural numbers arise from the two uses: ordinal numbers are used to describe the position of an element in a ordered sequence and cardinal numbers are used to specify the size of a given set.
open-encyclopedia.com /Natural_number   (1541 words)

  
 Cancellation property: Just the facts...   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-21)
An element a in a magma (M,*) has the right cancellation property (or is right-cancellative) if for all b and c in M b*a = c*a always implies b = c.
For example, every quasigroup (additional info and facts about quasigroup), and thus every group ((chemistry) two or more atoms bound together as a single unit and forming part of a molecule), is cancellative.
Moreover, we can be "constructive" with f taking the inverse (Something inverted in sequence or character or effect) in the range (A series of hills or mountains) of g and sending the rest precisely to a.
www.absoluteastronomy.com /encyclopedia/c/ca/cancellation_property.htm   (215 words)

  
 Insurance - Buck and Strout vs Allstate Insurance Company Hearing Decision
Long testified that the Company’s decision to cancel the policy is based upon physical changes in the property that resulted in the property becoming uninsurable.
He argued that the decision to cancel is rationally related to the insurability of the property.
The Company erroneously argued that the decision to cancel is rationally related to the insurability of the property, which is not now and has never been a standard for cancellation of a policy.
www.state.me.us /pfr/ins/hearing_2004-15521.htm   (654 words)

  
 Idaho Statutes   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-21)
In applying for a cancellation pursuant to this section, an applicant may submit an application at any time and the county commissioners may grant such application, either in whole or in part, at any regular meeting and the burden of proving the right of such cancellation shall rest upon the applicant.
Such appeal may only be filed by the property owner or by any person aggrieved, or by a person or entity acting on behalf of such person, when he deems any such action illegal or prejudicial to the public interest.
The Idaho Code is the property of the state of Idaho, and is copyrighted by Idaho law, I.C. According to Idaho law, any person who reproduces or distributes the Idaho Code for commercial purposes in violation of the provisions of this statute shall be deemed to be an infringer of the state of Idaho's copyright.
www3.state.id.us /cgi-bin/newidst?sctid=630070011.K   (483 words)

  
 S.C. Code of Laws Title 38 Chapter 75 Property, Casualty, And Title Insurance Generally - www.scstatehouse.net-LPITS
In the event of cancellation during the first year of the policy term, refund of premium for that portion of the policy term must be on a pro rata basis if cancellation is effected by the insurer or on the short rate basis if cancellation is effected by the insured.
In the event of cancellation during the third year of the policy term, refund of that portion of the unearned premium attributable to the third year must be on a pro rata basis if cancellation is effected by the insured.
Cancellation under items (2) through (5) of subsection (a) of this section is not effective unless written notice of cancellation has been delivered or mailed to the insured and the agent of record, if any, not less than thirty days prior to the proposed effective date of cancellation.
www.scstatehouse.net /code/t38c075.htm   (9304 words)

  
 03-779
Lincoln sent a memo to the Land Commissioner, recommending that he "cancel the sale" to the Carders and "allow the redemption," because "it is the policy of the office to write the sale information on the petition and highlight the information particularly the date the petition must be returned," which was not done.
If the Land Commissioner acted contrary to law by cancelling the sale to the Carders, there is no way for the Scholeses to enforce their right to a trial court's determination of ownership because more than two years have passed since the date that the Land Commissioner took action to set aside the tax sale.
The majority does so based on a cancellation deed issued by the Land Commissioner to the Carders and a redemption deed issued to the original owners (the Scholeses), even though it is clear that the Land Commissioner had no authority by statute to issue either deed.
courts.state.ar.us /opinions/2004a/20040429/03-779.html   (5841 words)

  
 Insurance - De Carlo and Callantine vs Patrons Oxford Insurance Company Hearing Decision
Section 3049(7) permits cancellation of a policy for the presence of a trampoline on the premises if the insured is notified that the policy will be cancelled if the trampoline is not removed and the trampoline, after notice, remains on the property 30 or more days after the date of notice.
She argued that the existence of the trampolines represents a substantial increase in the hazards insured against and is rationally related to the insurability of the property.
Although cancellation for failure to remove a trampoline within 30 days after notice by the insurer is now permitted by the Maine Property Insurance Cancellation Control Act, the insurer is also governed by the terms of its contract with the policyholders.
www.state.me.us /pfr/ins/hearing_2005-15725.htm   (1057 words)

  
 Insurance - Martin vs MMG Insurance Company Hearing Decision
The property is insured as a secondary residence for the Insured.
Stout stated that the tenant exposure constitutes a physical change in the property because there is no direct supervision of the property with a tenant, the property may become vacant if the tenant leaves, and the tenant may not treat the property as well as the Insured.
However, the property is insured as a secondary, seasonal residence which by its very nature implies that the residence is not occupied by the Insured for a portion of the year.
www.state.me.us /pfr/ins/hearing_2004-15743.htm   (1009 words)

  
 Insurance - Bryant vs. MMG Ins Co Hearing Decision
He stated that the property had deteriorated and had been improperly maintained in the time since it was first written by MMG, and its condition greatly increases the exposure to fire and liability losses.
There is no question that the condition of the property increases the risk of loss from several different perils covered by the policy, but MMG was unable to establish that the condition was in fact a change or when that change occurred.
MMG argued that the condition had changed since it was written, and that the governing statute allowed cancellation if the change occurred since the policy was first issued, regardless of any renewals that may have been issued in the interim.
www.state.me.us /pfr/ins/hearing_2003-13626.htm   (727 words)

  
 Personal Lines Cancellation/Nonrenewal   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-21)
Cancellations made pursuant to subsection (b) or (c) of this section shall be independent of and in addition to the number of notices of intention not to renew or to condition renewal upon reduction of limits or elimination of any coverages not required by law, permitted under this subsection.
The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to policies cancelled or nonrenewed by the insured or policies not renewed or cancelled pursuant to subparagraph (A), (B), (C), (D) or (E) of paragraph two of subsection (c) of this section.
The provisions of this subparagraph shall not apply to policies cancelled or nonrenewed by the insured or policies not renewed or cancelled pursuant to subparagraph (A), (B), (C), (D) or (E) of paragraph two of subsection (c) of this section.
www.elany.org /documnts/Statutes/3425.htm   (2793 words)

  
 UCC 2B Conference: UCC Article 2B Draft, Section 2B-702
Cancellation is not effective until the canceling party notifies the other party of cancellation.
Cancellation means putting an end to the contract for breach as compared to termination because the contract expired.
If the license terminates or is canceled, that "defense" dissolves; a licensee who continues to act in a manner inconsistent with any underlying intellectual property rights of the licensor exposes itself to an infringement claim.
www.law.berkeley.edu /institutes/bclt/events/ucc2b/draft/march_draft/702.html   (868 words)

  
 Insurance - Consumer's Guide - Cancellation, Nonrenewal
Cancellation is the termination of a policy at some point between the effective date of the policy and its anniversary date.
For a cancellation, the insurance company must give you at least 20 days written notice, except if the cancellation is for nonpayment of premium, then only ten days notice is required.
The Cancellation Control Acts do not give you the right to request a hearing if the insurance company issues a notice of cancellation before a new policy is in force 60 days.
www.state.me.us /pfr/ins/cancnonrenew.htm   (473 words)

  
 Insurance - Sienko vs State Farm Fire and Casualty Company Hearing Decision
The property consists of an apartment building which is connected to a main house.
The Insured also noted that the insured property consists of two buildings with separate roofs attached by a partition with its own roof, and there that there is no way to discern which roof the Company finds objectionable.
In the cancellation notice and through testimony at the hearing, the Company maintains that its reasonable loss control recommendation was not followed.
www.state.me.us /pfr/ins/hearing_2004-15681.htm   (1159 words)

  
 Insurance - Browne vs York Insurance Company of Maine Hearing Decision
She noted that cancellation of a policy is permitted if a physical change renders the property uninsurable.
Based upon the cancellation notice and the evidence provided at the hearing, it appears that the Company relies upon § 3049(5) which permits cancellation for “physical changes in the insured property which result in the property becoming uninsurable” as none of the other permitted grounds would apply.
The property at issue appears to be a seasonal residence used occasionally by various family members, and there is no indication that the usage has changed.
www.state.me.us /pfr/ins/hearing_2004-14934.htm   (808 words)

  
 Insurance - Lazas and Meister vs Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Company Hearing Decision
Armstrong stated in his affidavit that the application identified the property as tenant-occupied one-family dwelling, but a subsequent inspection determined that the building was occupied as a boarding house.
Lazas denied that the property is operated as a boarding house, and testified that it has not been operated as such since the 1980s.
He also stated that he explained the situation to the agent after receiving the cancellation notice, but that he was told it made no difference as the property value was too high for the Company to reconsider the cancellation.
www.state.me.us /pfr/ins/hearing_2004-15312.htm   (1059 words)

  
 Fannie Mae Announcement 99-06   (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-21)
Generally, borrowers who request cancellation of mortgage insurance based on the original value of the property will be those who have been making payments on the mortgage for a number of years and those who have made additional principal payments that have accelerated the amortization of their mortgage balances.
Generally, borrowers who request cancellation of mortgage insurance based on the current value of their property will be those who have increased the value of their property because of improvements they made and those who believe that the value of their property has increased because of increasing property values in the neighborhood.
When our requirements for cancellation of mortgage insurance are satisfied, the servicer must contact the borrower within 30 days after the cancellation occurs and inform him or her that the mortgage insurance has been cancelled and that no further escrow deposits for mortgage insurance will be required as part of the mortgage payment.
www.mbaa.org /resident/lib/fannie_9906.html   (5204 words)

  
 Insurance - Elizabeth Drake vs. MMG Insurance Company
At the time the notice of cancellation and subsequent Notice of Hearing were issued, it was unknown to both the insurer and the Bureau that the property was tenant-occupied.
He referenced the company’s concern over the property being unattended and unoccupied at the time the cancellation notice was issued, and then indicated it was later discovered that the property is now in fact rented out.
At some point during the policy term, the property became tenant-occupied, which is a different exposure posing an increased risk for many of the perils insured by the policy.
www.state.me.us /pfr/ins/hearing_2003-12744.htm   (944 words)

  
 Insurance - Stillwell vs. Hanover Hearing Decision
The subject property has been a rental since 1989 under the control of Mary Smith, who appears to have been the previous legal representative of the estate.
She further stated that there is very little control of the property with it being managed by someone out of state.
She testified that she has had the property cleaned up, and hired a caretaker to maintain the property and do minor repairs.
www.state.me.us /pfr/ins/hearing_2003-12716.htm   (975 words)

  
 Insurance - McNamee vs Concord General Mutual Insurance Company Hearing Decision
Although the Company’s testimony repeatedly refers to its “nonrenewal” of this policy, the action clearly is a mid-term cancellation as the policy term runs from October 2003 to October 2004, with a cancellation date of December 28, 2003.
She also indicated her belief that the Company issued the notice of cancellation because the house is located on an island, and the Company would have accepted the improvements without question if it the house were on the mainland.
In addition, a physical change that results in property becoming uninsurable would reasonably be considered a change that greatly increases the likelihood of a loss, rather than a change that results in betterment to the property.
www.state.me.us /pfr/ins/hearing_2003-14117.htm   (964 words)

  
 Insurance - Allan & Becky Thomas vs. Concord General Mutual Insurance Company Hearing Decision
She testified that the insured was notified in April that the policy would be cancelled unless the wiring was inspected by an electrician and any necessary repairs were made.
Becky Thomas stated in her affidavit that they believed the loss to be the result of a defective coffee maker they had recently purchased, and that the adjuster for Concord had recommended they return it to the store for a refund.
The Property Cancellation Control Act permits cancellation for a “physical change in the property that results in the property becoming uninsurable,” but no change has been demonstrated by Concord.
www.state.me.us /pfr/ins/hearing_2003-13333.htm   (876 words)

  
 Tax Analysts: Free Bulletins: Exempt Organizations: 2000-21: Church audits
The Tax Court has held a couple is not entitled to a charitable deduction for cancellation of property interests purportedly passing to a university and sustained the IRS determination of accuracy- related penalties.
Mumma and MHR Properties, a partnership in which the Signoms were the general partners, entered a lease with an option to purchase clause.
Thus, the court found that the cancellation of the property interests by the Signoms (or their MHR partnership) did not constitute a contribution or gift of property to the university within the meaning of section 170(c).
www.taxanalysts.com /www/tadiscus.nsf/Archives/0D81FDF16088A30E852568EF004AAC5D?OpenDocument   (1439 words)

  
 TravelHero.com Resources - partners.travelhero.com
Choose from one of the properties listed and while you are on that properties page, click on the link that says "check availability" for online reservations, or "request reservations" for those properties set up to do email reservations.
Cancellation numbers will be provided by email to our clients (except when you call the hotel directly, in which case be sure to ask for a cancellation number).
Cancellation policy differs from property to property, so be sure to read the cancellation policy on the hotel’s home page in our site.
aarons.travelhero.com /faq.cfm   (1826 words)

  
 Insurance - Baker vs Concord General Mutual Insurance Company Hearing Decision
The property is regularly checked by several relatives and a caretaker, and a monitoring system for security and temperature level is operational.
He indicated that the prior hearing established that certain measures were being taken to safeguard the home, but the sizable loss that has occurred in the interim demonstrates that the precautions were not sufficient to eliminate the increased exposure from an unoccupied dwelling or to mitigate a loss from further damage.
Accordingly, the Company has not demonstrated that the property is uninsurable and I do not reach the issue whether the change in occupancy constitutes a physical change in the property within the meaning of the statute.
www.state.me.us /pfr/ins/hearing_2004-14594.htm   (1081 words)

  
 Insurance - Knizeski vs Concord General Mutual Insurance Company Hearing Decision
The property has a central reporting alarm system for the house, which has been winterized and a caretaker addresses snow removal and other issues as needed.
She argued that the precautions taken (i.e., a watchful neighbor and central alarm system) were insufficient to eliminate the increased exposure to theft, vandalism, and seasonal weather damage.
The Company infers that the theft of property from the garage indicates the Insureds’ other precautions to protect the property from weather-related losses and other damage are insufficient, but no evidence was offered to support this conclusion.
www.state.me.us /pfr/ins/hearing_2004-14226.htm   (786 words)

Try your search on: Qwika (all wikis)

Factbites
  About us   |   Why use us?   |   Reviews   |   Press   |   Contact us  
Copyright © 2005-2007 www.factbites.com Usage implies agreement with terms.