| | ICANN | GAC Statements Concerning ccTLDs |
 | | Where the delegate of a ccTLD does not have the support of the relevant community, in the context of the ISO 3166 Code, and of the relevant public authority or government, that, upon request, ICANN exercise its authority with the utmost promptness to reassign the delegation. |
 | | Thereafter, the GAC encourages that any future contracts between ICANN and ccTLD administrators should reflect the administrators commitment to be bound by the GAC Principles (as they are implemented by the relevant government or public authority) and minimize the liability of ICANN for implementing a redelegation according to these principles. |
 | | Meanwhile, should ICANN and the ccTLD administrator envisage entering into bilateral (legacy) agreements, such agreements should be provisional and interim in nature, pending appropriate expression by the relevant government or public authority for participation in a tri-partite regime. |
| www.icann.org /cctlds/gac-statements-concerning-cctlds-16dec01.htm (1848 words) |