| |
| | Judicial Supplement 3 - The Prosecutor v. Blagoje Simic, Milan Simic, Miroslav Tadic, Stevan Todorovic and Simo Zaric - ... |
 | | As to the latter point, however, the Defence argued that the character of the conflict would (probably) be under appeal in both judgements and, therefore, contested the Prosecutions conclusion that, pursuant to Sub-rule 94(B), judicial notice may be taken of the issue. |
 | | The Defence further contended that the character of the conflict is controversial and submitted that the issue of judicial notice should be approached with great caution. |
 | | Finally, the Defence argued that the legal conclusion drawn from the characterisation of the conflict, which is based on an interpretation of facts, is not appropriate for judicial notice. |
| www.un.org /icty/Supplement/supp3-e/simic.htm (1535 words) |
|