| |
| | Advocating the Elimination of Gender-Based Discrimination, University of Cape Town, South Africa (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-04) |
 | | In determining that the defendant's rights were not violated, Justice Kriegler canvassed foreign precedents, especially U.S. and Canadian decisions; he prefaced his examination, however, by warning that "the use of foreign precedent requires circumspection." [1997 (12) BCLR 1675 (CC) at 26.] In State v. |
 | | Justice Jackson drew from that comparison support for the conclusion that, without more specific congressional authorization, the U.S. President could not seize private property (in that case, the steel mills) even in aid of a war effort. |
 | | At the time Justice Jackson cast a comparative sideglance at Weimar Germany, the United States itself was a source of "negative authority." The Attorney General pressed that point in an amicus brief for the United States in Brown v. |
| www.supremecourtus.gov /publicinfo/speeches/sp_02-07b-06.html (3704 words) |
|