| |
| | From Objection I (Caterus): (Objective Reality) (Site not responding. Last check: ) |
 | | What, in that case, is the meaning of that well-worn maxim which is common knowledge: the infinite qua infinite is unknown?' When I think of a chiliagon, and construct for myself a confused representation of some figure, I do not distinctly imagine the chiliagon itself, since I do not distinctly see the thousand sides. |
 | | And if this is so, then the question obviously arises as to how the infinite can be thought of in a distinct as opposed to a confused manner, given that the infinite perfections that make it up cannot be seen clearly 'before the eyes' as it were. |
 | | But if we fix our gaze on some part of the sea at close quarters, then our view can be clear and distinct, just as our picture of a chiliagon can be, if it is confined to one or two of the sides. |
| www.anselm.edu /homepage/dbanach/dc-obj-god.htm (3451 words) |
|