| | Axiom of choice Article, Axiomchoice Information (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-13) |
 | | The axiom of choice has been proven to be independent of the remaining axioms of set theory ; that is, it can be neither proven nor disproven from them (unless those remaining axioms contain anunknown contradiction). |
 | | An example of this is the Banach-Tarski paradox which amounts to saying that it is possible to "carve-up" the 3-dimensionalsolid unit ball into finitely many pieces, and, using only rotation and translation, reassemble the pieces into two balls eachwith the same volume as the original. |
 | | Several central theorems in various branches of mathematics require the axiom of choice (or one of its weaker versions, suchas the Boolean prime ideal theorem, the axiom of countable choice, or the axiom of dependent choice). |
| www.anoca.org /set/sets/axiom_of_choice.html (995 words) |