| |
| | Drew D. Dropkin, Linking the Culpability and Circumstantial Evidence Requirements for the Spoliation Inference, 51 Duke ... (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-06) |
 | | When evidence is within the control of a party whose natural interests it would be to produce that evidence, and that party destroys the evidence without adequate cause, it may be inferred that such evidence would be unfavorable to that party. |
 | | Although courts have departed considerably from the unqualified conviction that the spoliation inference is insufficient, absent extrinsic evidence, to serve as evidence of the contents of the spoliated evidence, judicial treatment of the circumstantial evidence requirement for the spoliation inference remains muddled. |
 | | Because spoliation of evidence clearly violates the spirit of discovery, a wide range of sanctions may be imposed under the Rules of Civil Procedure, including dismissal of the lawsuit, entry of a default judgment, exclusion of evidence and testimony, and assessing monetary penalties. |
| www.law.duke.edu /journals/dlj/articles/DLJ51P1803.HTM (9898 words) |
|