| |
| | [No title] |
 | | When Rucker tendered to Citicorp the total for back payments that had been specified by Citicorp, he was notified for the first time that the premium rate stated to him as an annual rate was instead a monthly rate of premium and that an additional amount of $4,300 was past due. |
 | | Citicorp filed a motion to strike and dismiss the counterclaim, and the motion was set for hearing on February 20, 1991. |
 | | Citicorp argued that (1) the cause of action was barred by the law of the case Ô ? ð#´ < | |