| |
| | muccigrosso (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-11-02) |
 | | A comparison of the accounts suggests that both were using the same source for Caecus censorship, and that both misinterpreted the passage to result in different years for the rejection of the lectio, both wrong. |
 | | For both Caecus and Fabius, this elogium differs from the better known Forum-Augusti examples, and presents otherwise unattested activity: for Caecus, we hear of no dealings with a Hannibal, for Fabius there is nothing about a lectio. |
 | | This is Diodorus only extended mention of any censorship or of Caecus, and the details, as well as his account of the rest of the year, suggest that he was drawing on the same ultimate source as Livy. |
| www.apaclassics.org /AnnualMeeting/98mtg/abstracts/muccigrosso.html (472 words) |
|