| |
| | The Nuclear Option |
 | | Back then, in 1975, it was a bare Democratic majority that mustered the will to force a change in Rule XXII, the "cloture rule," decreasing the number of votes required to break a filibuster from two-thirds of the Senate, or 67 votes, to the current level of three-fifths of the body, or 60 votes. |
 | | Thus, Rule XXII presents a majoritarian conundrum: Not only do the anti-majoritarian rules enacted by a simple majority of a previous Senate bind the current Senate, but a current majority cannot even change those previously adopted rules without the consent of a supermajority. |
 | | On the practical front, the constitutional rule against legislative entrenchment means that it must be possible for the current Senate to amend, repeal, or ratify Standing Rule XXII by a simple majority vote of the body. |
| cfif.org /htdocs/freedomline/current/in_our_opinion/nuclear_option.htm (1057 words) |
|