| |
| | 1993 Undergraduate Prize Winning Paper |
 | | Arguments Made Against Agricultural Collectives It is commonly argued in the West that collectives, as such, were responsible for the suppression of peasant livelihood and that the recent economic improvements are the direct consequences of their dismantling. |
 | | Since crop yields had advanced nationwide earlier under collective farming and declined in the advanced areas under household responsibility, the burden of proof, it seems to me, lies with those who insist that the new incentive structure contributed decisively to increased yields. |
 | | As was seen, the ability of collectives to develop, maintain, and utilize a large-scale water-control infrastructure and the conviction among the peasantry that grain production under the collective is, for this reason, more efficient than that under the household, together shed doubt upon claims that scale is of no benefit in agriculture. |
| nautarch.tamu.edu /anth/sea/papers/1993ugpaper.htm (7325 words) |
|