| |
| | DAllon, The Problem with Congress and Copyright Law, 44 Santa Clara L. Rev. 365 (2004) |
 | | The important point is this: the Statute of Anne, the ancestor of American copyright law, had as its foremost objective the encouragement of learning--a general public interest--not the private economic interests of authors, printers, or publishers. |
 | | Blackstone, in his first edition of Commentaries on the Laws of England in 1766, acknowledged that there was no "direct determination upon the right of authors at the common law." [FN322] Citing decisions from chancery courts and legislative recognition of copyrights, Blackstone favored the existence of common law copyright. |
 | | Ashcroft continue to acknowledge the utilitarian public benefit rationale for copyright protection; "[t]he 'constitutional command,' we have recognized, is that Congress, to the extent it enacts copyright laws at all, create[s] a 'system' that 'promote[s] the Progress of Science."' [FN419] In Eldred, however, the Court did step back from its prior statements. |
| homepages.law.asu.edu /~dkarjala/OpposingCopyrightExtension/commentary/DallonProblemWithCongressSantaClaraLRev2004.htm (13770 words) |
|