| |
| | Ring laws (Site not responding. Last check: 2007-10-22) |
 | | When an operation is shown as a grid where the entry i, j in the grid is the element (i op b), I can see immediately what the commutative property looks like (grid symmetric about diagonal from top left) and what a unit, a zero, or a unity looks like. |
 | | For addition, the relation {((1, 2), 2), ((2, 2), 2), ((2, 1), 2), ((1, 1), 2)} satisfies commutivity and associativity but it lacks a zero, so a proof based only on commutivity and associativity cannot be what I want. |
 | | I mean that the laws of commutivity and associativity of addition are blind to that addition rule; they couldn't discover it not to be valid ring addition even though it isn't. |
| www.physicsforums.com /showthread.php?t=71523 (1207 words) |
|