| |
| | The Kalam Cosmological Argument Yet Again: The Question of the Metaphysical Possibility of an Infinite Temporal Series |
 | | But this response is clearly inadequate, for the years of an infinite past could be enumerated by the negative numbers, in which case a completed infinity of years would, indeed, entail a countdown from infinity [i.e., countdown through an infinity]. |
 | | For (1) then he would have completed an actual infinite by successive addition, which is impossible because you can always add one more, and (2) as we saw with Tristam Shandy, the man's task would have always been done, and hence never been done, which is contrary to our seeing him doing it now. |
 | | An infinite temporal series, just as any other real infinite, is never completed but always complete, in the sense that it does not involve a necessarily-always-finite set which never can be completed so as to be an infinite set by the addition of members. |
| www.infidels.org /library/modern/arnold_guminski/kalam2.shtml (8642 words) |
|