| |
| | A QUESTION FOR EXPRESSIVISTS |
 | | Paul Horwich argues, drawing on his minimalist view of truth, that it follows from the point, granted by expressivists and their foes alike, that ethical sentences are meaningful, grammatically declarative ones, that they are truth apt, are truth assessable, or have truth conditions (for our purposes we need not distinguish these three notions). |
 | | It would, that is, be too quick to point out that indicative conditionals are sentences we produce as a result of our learned mastery of a natural language, and then conclude without further ado that they have truth conditions on the ground that they must, being convention-governed, express beliefs. |
 | | And we have said nothing to rule out this possibility, though we would insist that the onus of proof does not lie with us. |
| philrsss.anu.edu.au /people-defaults/fcj/Expressivism.html (5730 words) |
|